1, Agree on the bot issue, but this is another issue that needs to be solved. 2, "Spending it without having…

1, Agree on the bot issue, but this is another issue that needs to be solved. 2, "Spending it without having an - at least somewhat - sticky product doesn’t sound like a great idea to me." - There's no sticky product, because there's no incentive to build one. The chicken or the egg dilemma, until we bite into one of our hands, it will remain an unsolvable stalemate. It's a delusional dream that small one-person hobby projects will build something that attracts people. Because it's never the product that draws them in, but the marketing, whether it's direct or indirect. The other route is for the apps themselves to seek investors, but perhaps it would be simpler if Lens, as the base entity, were the one to invest in them in the first place. And there should be funds available, I highly doubt that the over $30 million in seed funding was spent on the migration or the development of the Lens Chain. I might have enough insight into this industry to know that what we’re seeing here is not the result of a $30 million investment. If even a fraction of that were used to boost the ecosystem (e.g. $1 million instead of $50k), whether through backing a token or angel investing into dApps, the picture would look completely different. https://lens.xyz/news/lens-closes-31-million-strategic-raise