Comment by @stani • Hey
Interesting points from the developer's perspective, would you see that would be good idea to add more flexibility to the metadata or just expand what it c
Comments
- Bring-your-own-smart-contract sounds super interesting, and something I’d really like to see. Per what @punkess.lens said, if NFTs posted, spread, and minted via lens were able to match the collection format of other nfts, there is no reason someone couldn’t launch and market their entire collection (their entire brand) direct from lens. It is pretty close as-is, we can integrate properties, descriptions, properly encoded Uri like any collection…but the “collection-name” seems too Lens focused rn. For example, my PFP minted via lens: https://rarible.com/token/polygon/0xdd1d474e3e09c34bd3ada3793125b63c8342a9b5:1?tab=properties (minted as an on-chain SVG via the lenshub contract).
But, shoot, personalized smart contracts for creators would be huge. Dynamic NFTs could make DAO tokens, like @korudao.lens, universal billboards that adapt to whoever has the mic, allow for more easily editable posts, provide framework for truly community composed art, provide more control over content rights, creator identify, community building.
- rn I think the collect/NFT metadata should be compatible with the major market places. The title of on lens collected NFTs is a great example mentioned by @carstenpoetter.lens regularly.
eg #Lenstopia citizen collected on #lens vs #CosmoPolly by @erikamoji.lens minted „not on lens“.
Imo NFTs (especially music NFTs) could benefit a ton from great metadata. Just think about data supported curation and recommendation.
bring your smart contract sounds interesting, the important part imo is that discovery and minting will take place in the same „app“ / UI (from a user perspective).
- Yea sounds dope, would love to bring my art to lens
- Smart contract directly in lens.
- yap, just it.
- Good, I agree with you
- yye'yes
- Big news 😄