Post by @panwinyl • Hey
Hi
I've noticed a dangerous shift in my thinking: I'm not thinking about solving a problem, I'm thinking about what command to give the AI to solve that pr
Comments
- @lens/jessyjeanne @lens/romain_millon @lens/jeanayala @lens/rsvd1 @lens/yukifren13
thanks for your comments, they help to better understand what is happening to me, I prefer to talk to you, to live people (I hope you are not bots :D :D :D :D) than to ask AI about it, to know your thoughts and emotions about it, what it evokes in you. This is the difference between talking to AI and talking to humans, I can get to know not only your thoughts but also your emotions, understand how you are affected by what affects me. In this way, a collectivity is built, based on compassion, understanding and love :) Thanks!
- “If men create intelligent machines, or fantasize about them, it is either because they secretly despair of their own intelligence or because they are in danger of succumbing to the weight of a monstrous and useless intelligence which they seek to exorcize by transferring it to machines, where they can play with it and make fun of it. By entrusting this burdensome intelligence to machines we are released from any responsibility to knowledge, much as entrusting power to politicians allows us to disdain any aspiration of our own to power.
If men dream of machines that are unique, that are endowed with genius, it is because they despair of their own uniqueness, or because they prefer to do without it - to enjoy it by proxy, so to speak, thanks to machines. What such machines offer is the spectacle of thought, and in manipulating them people devote themselves more to the spectacle of thought than to thought itself.
It is not for nothing that they are described as 'virtual', for they put thought on hold indefinitely, tying its emergence to the achievement of a complete knowledge. The act of thinking itself is thus put off for ever. Indeed, the question of thought can no more be raised than the question of the freedom of future generations, who will pass through life as we travel through the air, strapped into their seats. These Men of Artificial Intelligence will traverse their own mental space bound hand and foot to their computers. Immobile in front of his computer, Virtual Man makes love via the screen and gives lessons by means of the teleconference. He is a physical - and no doubt also a mental cripple. That is the price he pays for being operational. Just as eyeglasses and contact lenses will arguably one day evolve into implanted prostheses for a species that has lost its sight, it is similarly to be feared that artificial intelligence and the hardware that supports it will become a mental prosthesis for a species without the capacity for thought.
Artificial intelligence is devoid of intelligence because it is devoid of artifice.”
― Jean Baudrillard, The Transparency of Evil: Essays in Extreme Phenomena, 1990
- humans will become meta thinkers
- Gm, is it good or bad?
- Gm, is it good or bad?？？
- bass
- Gm, I understand your point, but you should not be scared... Do you go to the library to make a search or do you use Google ?
- It's not bad but there should be not be overdependence on it.
- you are going to get rich
- Meta thinkers, but the society is not ready for that in a short time
- Always has been the case, always will be the case. Leverage factor that humans have in making their ideas come to life is increasing exponentially. Kind of like evolution.
- good
- AI will change the way we think