mataverse ◱ ◱ (@mataverse) • Hey

😎

Stats

Publications

Collect on @lens/hey via $BONSAI is active! Make your own posts collectable or collect someone else's content - with @lens/bonsai (Like this post! 1000 Bonsai - 30 days)
BONSAI Token Launch 🍃 Bonsai is a #DN404 token on #Polygon, for a community of builders, explorers, and early adopters of onchain social. For every 100k $BONSAI tokens in your wallet, you also hold 1 BONSAI NFT (reveal soon) Season 1 airdrop went to active profiles across the @lens/lens ecosystem. Seasons 2 & 3 will reward usage of $BONSAI for collects and open actions. Swap & Liquidity Providing (LP) open actions coming soon. Collect this genesis post to show you were early - 10 MATIC / 30 days
I particularly like this one @lens/interfacelabs https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x30b8cd2e3ac893e237577999760652a847509e39/1?referrer=0xd174ad0D1E36c7a60CD922E966354095233f8F23
Just minted Day 119 on @basepaint_xyz! Hundreds of pixel artists made this together on the blockchain. Minting is open only for 24h https://basepaint.xyz/mint/119
Lenny is heading to Devconnect and @lens/ethglobal İstanbul
Posting from Yup! app.yup.io
I just minted 5.00 GHO #Aave https://app.aave.com/?marketName=proto_mainnet_v3
I just minted 5.00 GHO #Aave https://app.aave.com/?marketName=proto_mainnet_v3
I just claimed "AISC Mystery Box" on Coinvise, check it out! https://coinvise.co/coinvise/mysterybox
I just claimed "AISC DAY 5 - Squid" on Coinvise, check it out! https://coinvise.co/AlphaInsiders/squid
I just claimed "AISC DAY 1 - Linea" on Coinvise, check it out! https://coinvise.co/AlphaInsiders/Linea
IYKYK
Just minted Day 48 on @basepaint_xyz! Hundreds of pixel artists made this together on the blockchain. Minting is open only for 24h https://basepaint.xyz/mint/48
I just voted on "Wawa Derivative Contest - Derivative Art" https://snapshot.org/#/phi-voting.eth/proposal/0x83dc125302bdef2e62f7f38d9cfbd2fa4b2292a019a54f24f64c825680236365 #Snapshot
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 Now you can mint **Zora NFTs** directly through @lenster.lens 🟣 by just sharing the Zora link on your post, Dive into the seamless experience of showcasing your unique digital art and share what you got 💬 You can mint the below NFT to celebrate this moment 🎉 https://zora.co/collect/zora:0xeb0851f650150fec6b80ed894d95d152e7166a5b
Just minted 'times_is_hard' by @the_anons.lens ‏‏‎ ‎ 🔥 Minted on: @oohlala.lens 🔗 Contract: @lensprotocol ‏‏‎ ‎ https://www.oohlala.xyz/track/816207f2-f526-4d16-a980-7f1f7296a18a
Just minted Day 38 on @basepaint_xyz! Hundreds of pixel artists made this together on the blockchain. Minting is open only for 24h https://basepaint.art/mint/38
✨🌈WAWA IS LIVE FOR MINT🌈✨ Now, it's time to cast a spell on your wallet to become Wawa! ✨🧙‍♀️🪄 https://wawa.philand.xyz/mint 🪄🧙‍♀️✨ Wawa is onchain you, letting you explore, play, and connect with others in the onchain world. You have only 2 weeks to #BecomeWawa. Mint will end by 26th Sep 12:00 PM UTC⌛️ Don't miss this miracle!👀💫
Funny that no one has creates a bonding curve pay to follow module on Lens, where every next follow increases in value
Check out this campaign on Coinvise ✨ Claim it here → https://coinvise.co/claim/a559f798-6241-4544-b47c-27789421ba67
TGIF Our fav Web3 stories this week: 🔥Gary Gensler's hypocritical stance on crypto 🔥Binance pulling out of the Voyager deal 🔥$145m $ARB airdropped to various DAOs 🔥 Yuga Labs wins in court against a copycat NFT project Read more: https://web3onfire.beehiiv.com/p/crypto-wallets-thriving
🤝 YouMeme is now live on #Polygon & @lensprotocol, empowering you to **take ownership of your** #content 🌿 💪 Join us on our #Web3 journey towards a user-owned, #privacy-focused, and #censorship-resistant #socialnetwork future! 👉 Head over to YouMeme.com to **share your hottest on-chain** #memes! 🔥 📰 Read more on Medium: https://rb.gy/6lcfq
I just voted "In Favor" on "RFP-19: Radiant Expansion & Deployment to Ethereum Mainnet" https://snapshot.org/#/radiantcapital.eth/proposal/0xe1fb6cf6462394ba0002e2c64eb7f645862a22595faef78f35ede71f3f4579ab #Snapshot
What is the most underappreciated project on @lensprotocol ?
I just voted "Yes" on "Add Euro Coin ($EUROC) to Stargate" https://snapshot.org/#/stgdao.eth/proposal/0xcbefd708a0b64d9e9d634e5d7f57c5056b59285b6a5ba18492cfea4db6a53104 #Snapshot
Today marks our 1 Year Anniversary of making friends onchain 🎂! Thank you to everyone who has made the first year of Lens Protocol so special and groundbreaking. Lens has brought together builders, creators, communities, and friends, all while in beta. There's so much planned for the second year ahead, and we can't wait to continue to grow with all of you. Who did you become frens with on Lens? 🎨 by @nftsushi.lens and all collect proceeds go directly to the artist.
I just voted on "Season 8 Seasonal Funding (corrected)" https://snapshot.org/#/banklessvault.eth/proposal/0xc02b3fb6eed58561c7526749a5505501ad14c3d31b4b0f79020baf994cc77c41 #snapshotlabs
Eeeehhhh...Who wants to own the first $WAV3 tokens? 👀👀👀 We are starting our campaing to decentralice our pre seed round 🫡 We released 👉 99 spots to join our round this month, and our Discord community already occupied 34% of the spots in the lasts hours!!! They got the alpha first. We are crowdsourcing a total of 20.000 Matic in this campaign, having a minimum of 202 matics per spot. These tokens will be redeemable for private equity or a liquid token that we'll release in the future! And the first holders will have 🌟 special 🌟 treatment when that happens ❤️ This campaing will last until 29 of april 🗓️ We must get to the goal this month first! In the case we reach it, next will be accounted in the same valuation. Anyone interested just write to wav3s DMs, law forbides us to share the link in public! DONT SHARE THE LINK WE SEND YOU IN DMs PUBLICLY, at least that's what the securities law demands 🤷‍♂️ ONLY ACCEPT LINKS COMING FROM THIS ACCOUNT plsss!!!! don't fall for scams 🌊 🌊 🌊 🌊 🌊 PD: If you see this message "No club found on this address", connect your wallet in the upper rigth corner, be sure to be using Polygon FULL DISCLOSURE: This token is for early supporters, if you want full settled tokenomics, you can wait til we launch the public token, after all the early supporters were rewarded 😋
MEETVERS TOKEN What if there would be a way to record the profile score into a blockchain, so every user, app and project could access it directly? We've found a way! 😳 From now on, every collector of our #MeetversScore posts not only gets a nice visual overview, but also a corresponding amount of Meetvers tokens! Collecting this post gets you a special Denver edition 🤩 Let us cook! 🧑‍🍳🪐
TRADING CARDS (🃏;🪐) 1️⃣ FIRST BATCH OF 182 CARDS RELEASED (🃏;◻️) 74 common cards out of 101,103 possible (🃏;🟦) 64 rare cards out of 9,770 possible (🃏;🟩) 34 epic cards out of 1,494 possible (🃏;🟪) 10 mythic cards out of 122 possible (🃏;🏆) no legendary card has been claimed yet 👨‍💻 You can check all claimed cards at http://cards.meetvers.io 2️⃣ MEETVERS CARDONOMICS 101 🏆 Five rarities: common, rare, epic, mythic, legendary 📊 Three rarities limited (epic: 200, mythic: 100, legendary: 25) 🔥 Published cards with zero collects in one month get burned 💰 Revenue split between us and profile of the collected cards 🚀 Support your favourite creators & bet on their Lens future 3️⃣ BUILD YOUR OWN CARD COLLECTION ♥️ Create a deck of cards with your favourite OG Lens frens ♣️ Trade your cards with your Lens frens (3 rares for 1 epic? 🤔) ♦️ Play a bunch of top trumps games with your best Lens frens ♠️ Come up with your own game – it’s a true Web3 game! 🚀 4️⃣ HOW TO CLAIM YOUR PROFILE’S CARD 🖼️ Collect and mirror this post to be in the 2nd batch! (We set a fee of 0.1 MATIC, so we can set a collect limit) (Only applies for unclaimed profiles in the 1st batch)’ Let the games begin and let us cook! 👨‍🍳
The Collectors of Promoted Collectible Posts: A Case Study by Meetvers Recently, we‘ve discovered that posting on Lens Protocol without using the marketing tool @Wav3s.lens does not generate us enough engagement, even if our profile (@meetvers.lens) has a reasonable number of followers (as of writing this article, we had over 1 200 followers). We wouldn’t mind promoting our posts at all, but something caught our attention. Despite publishing quite a few successful posts that generated a considerable volume in the past, and the service paid for by the collectors becoming more and more attractive (we hope!) in the present, the number of our paid collectors has significantly dropped. For the purposes of this case study, we’ve decided to compare a free-to-collect post (A: meet-Cl-495; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x01ef), and a paid-to-collect post (B: meet-Cl-91; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x5b). Both posted via Wav3s using similar strategies. Post A was just an announcement post about our trading cards collection being launched, there was no service tied to the free collect. Post B was collectible for 1 MATIC (100 limit), the collectors received a visual overview with 3 different scorings of their profiles. There’s also another paid-to-collect post (C: meet-Cl-682; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x02aa) that, in our opinion, underperformed. We are curious as to why this post didn't follow up on the success of the announcement post, especially given that Lens Protocol users loved the idea of having their own personalized trading card – and this was an opportunity for everyone to get one. Additionally, the cost of collecting this post was ten times cheaper than collecting a successful post B (with just a visual overview). Let’s get straight to the point and look who were the collectors of the posts A and B. For complete comparison, a Lens Protocol user has in average (median) 92 (17) followers, 28 (5) posts, 26 (2) mirrors, 12 (2) comments. An average Meetvers score is 286, with the median of 40. An average number of collects per post is a little over 1, an average number of mirrors per post is 0.94. These metrics are obviously higher in case of the posts made with @Wav3s.lens. In general, posts A, B, and C were posted via @Wav3s.lens using similar strategies. First 30 users with 130+ followers (150+ followers in case of post C; first 50 users in case of post B) were eligible for 0.1 WMATIC as a reward for mirroring one of these posts. This is the promoting strategy that is quite common across Lens Protocol nowadays, as we see. Both posts A and B were liked 389-times, but post B destroyed post A regarding other statistics. Post B was commented 211-times (~100 comments were made by us), meanwhile Post A was commented only 21-times. Post B was mirrored 390-times (!!!), but post A was mirrored (only) 136-times. Post C got 109 likes, 5 comments, 60 mirrors, and 5 collects. What was the reason behind the dominance of post B? And why was post C such a disappointment? Let’s dig deeper into the data about the collectors of posts A and B. The set of profiles collecting post B has – in general – better statistics than the set of profiles collecting post A. We believe this was caused by bots that diluted the statistics of the latter set, because the collecting fee of 1 WMATIC effectively prevented these to collect post B, and thus make the averages pretty much the same for both posts. As you can see, the Meetvers score of the collectors of post B is over 4-times higher than of those who collected post A (considering there was a limit of 100 collects for post B, it’s still an extraordinary difference). Even the median score is more than doubled, so it’s not really caused by more high-score profiles (up to 268 753 score points in the case of post B). Higher Meetvers score implies higher follower counts as well. The collectors of post B have in average 3-times the followers of those who collected post A, and the median in case of post B is higher more than 3-times as well (surprisingly, the median of post B is even higher that the average number of followers per collector in case of post A). Whether it is obvious or not, for the pay-to-collect post, the average amount of WMATIC held per collector is 2.8-times higher (8.322 WMATIC for our post with a collect fee of 1 WMATIC). It’s important to note that only about 40 % of the collectors of post A were able to collect post B, with their median amount of WMATIC being just 0.6. The most surprising statistic pertains to the mirrors. While the average number of mirrors made by both sets is similar, the median for the free-to-collect post is almost double. This could suggest that the post was mirrored by profiles harvesting Wav3s, but this theory is not substantiated as we only considered the profile data of the collectors in this case study. To wrap it up, post B generated much greater engagement in terms of quantifiable metrics, such as number of comments and mirrors. It was also collected (and often mirrored as well) by – statistically speaking – better profiles with high Meetvers score, thus generating higher engagement and – very possibly – a higher number of impressions. This case study also shows how valuable indicator Meetvers score might be. Post B – which was in our eyes much successful – was able to surpass the median Meetvers score of the other post more than 2-times, and the average Meetvers score more than 3-times. This was also reflected in individual profile statistics. We would like to hear your thoughts on the underperformance of post C. Do you believe that it was due to an overflow of similar posts at the time (qualitative), or a lack of attention from 'game-changing' profiles with high engagement and influence in the beginning (quantitative)? Let's discuss it in the comments. Cheers. https://medium.com/@meetvers/the-collectors-of-promoted-collectible-posts-a-case-study-by-meetvers-c4525f851ffa
The Collectors of Promoted Collectible Posts: A Case Study by Meetvers Recently, we‘ve discovered that posting on Lens Protocol without using the marketing tool @Wav3s.lens does not generate us enough engagement, even if our profile (@meetvers.lens) has a reasonable number of followers (as of writing this article, we had over 1 200 followers). We wouldn’t mind promoting our posts at all, but something caught our attention. Despite publishing quite a few successful posts that generated a considerable volume in the past, and the service paid for by the collectors becoming more and more attractive (we hope!) in the present, the number of our paid collectors has significantly dropped. For the purposes of this case study, we’ve decided to compare a free-to-collect post (A: meet-Cl-495; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x01ef), and a paid-to-collect post (B: meet-Cl-91; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x5b). Both posted via Wav3s using similar strategies. Post A was just an announcement post about our trading cards collection being launched, there was no service tied to the free collect. Post B was collectible for 1 MATIC (100 limit), the collectors received a visual overview with 3 different scorings of their profiles. There’s also another paid-to-collect post (C: meet-Cl-682; https://lenster.xyz/posts/0x98dd-0x02aa) that, in our opinion, underperformed. We are curious as to why this post didn't follow up on the success of the announcement post, especially given that Lens Protocol users loved the idea of having their own personalized trading card – and this was an opportunity for everyone to get one. Additionally, the cost of collecting this post was ten times cheaper than collecting a successful post B (with just a visual overview). Let’s get straight to the point and look who were the collectors of the posts A and B. For complete comparison, a Lens Protocol user has in average (median) 92 (17) followers, 28 (5) posts, 26 (2) mirrors, 12 (2) comments. An average Meetvers score is 286, with the median of 40. An average number of collects per post is a little over 1, an average number of mirrors per post is 0.94. These metrics are obviously higher in case of the posts made with @Wav3s.lens. In general, posts A, B, and C were posted via @Wav3s.lens using similar strategies. First 30 users with 130+ followers (150+ followers in case of post C; first 50 users in case of post B) were eligible for 0.1 WMATIC as a reward for mirroring one of these posts. This is the promoting strategy that is quite common across Lens Protocol nowadays, as we see. Both posts A and B were liked 389-times, but post B destroyed post A regarding other statistics. Post B was commented 211-times (~100 comments were made by us), meanwhile Post A was commented only 21-times. Post B was mirrored 390-times (!!!), but post A was mirrored (only) 136-times. Post C got 109 likes, 5 comments, 60 mirrors, and 5 collects. What was the reason behind the dominance of post B? And why was post C such a disappointment? Let’s dig deeper into the data about the collectors of posts A and B. The set of profiles collecting post B has – in general – better statistics than the set of profiles collecting post A. We believe this was caused by bots that diluted the statistics of the latter set, because the collecting fee of 1 WMATIC effectively prevented these to collect post B, and thus make the averages pretty much the same for both posts. As you can see, the Meetvers score of the collectors of post B is over 4-times higher than of those who collected post A (considering there was a limit of 100 collects for post B, it’s still an extraordinary difference). Even the median score is more than doubled, so it’s not really caused by more high-score profiles (up to 268 753 score points in the case of post B). Higher Meetvers score implies higher follower counts as well. The collectors of post B have in average 3-times the followers of those who collected post A, and the median in case of post B is higher more than 3-times as well (surprisingly, the median of post B is even higher that the average number of followers per collector in case of post A). Whether it is obvious or not, for the pay-to-collect post, the average amount of WMATIC held per collector is 2.8-times higher (8.322 WMATIC for our post with a collect fee of 1 WMATIC). It’s important to note that only about 40 % of the collectors of post A were able to collect post B, with their median amount of WMATIC being just 0.6. The most surprising statistic pertains to the mirrors. While the average number of mirrors made by both sets is similar, the median for the free-to-collect post is almost double. This could suggest that the post was mirrored by profiles harvesting Wav3s, but this theory is not substantiated as we only considered the profile data of the collectors in this case study. To wrap it up, post B generated much greater engagement in terms of quantifiable metrics, such as number of comments and mirrors. It was also collected (and often mirrored as well) by – statistically speaking – better profiles with high Meetvers score, thus generating higher engagement and – very possibly – a higher number of impressions. This case study also shows how valuable indicator Meetvers score might be. Post B – which was in our eyes much successful – was able to surpass the median Meetvers score of the other post more than 2-times, and the average Meetvers score more than 3-times. This was also reflected in individual profile statistics. We would like to hear your thoughts on the underperformance of post C. Do you believe that it was due to an overflow of similar posts at the time (qualitative), or a lack of attention from 'game-changing' profiles with high engagement and influence in the beginning (quantitative)? Let's discuss it in the comments. Cheers. https://medium.com/@meetvers/the-collectors-of-promoted-collectible-posts-a-case-study-by-meetvers-c4525f851ffa
gm
Gm @layer3.lens
I just contributed to the 🕯️ KZG Ceremony 🕯️ using 0xd174a…8f23 to help scale Ethereum ↓ Add your own randomness ↓ ceremony.ethereum.org
Nexon Finance mainnet is live on #zkSync Era 🔥 Checkout: https://app.nexon.finance
✨ **Introducing Glass Protocol ✨** gm lens fam ☀️ For those of you that don’t know us, we’re building a protocol for decentralized video on Ethereum. We’re passionate about video. We believe in having true ownership over the videos you make, how they’re seen, and how they’re monetized. That’s why we’re building an open, permissionless protocol for owning, distributing, and building communities around video. And that’s why we’re constantly experimenting and building with new Web3 communities to help us further our mission… which brings us to Lens. We’re excited to build more ways for the video creators in the Lens community to create amazing videos with Glass. Oh—and one more thing. We just announced The Glass Pass, an NFT that represents your creator identity, and your key to owning and creating videos on Glass. You can read more about it here: https://blog.glass.xyz And to show our love to the Lens community... 🏆 **Anyone who collects this post will be recorded on The Glass Pass claim allowlist** 🏆 And if you vibe with our mission, check out our Manifesto: https://glass.xyz/manifesto People who **sign it and** **share it to Lens** will also get early access to claim The Glass Pass. We’re excited to be here and can’t wait to share what we have in store! We're just getting started✌️ #genesispost
I just signed the Glass Manifesto and got early access to claim The Glass Pass. See you on @glassxyz.lens : https://glass.xyz/manifesto
Hey LT fam🌿 Call to researchers, creators, online content consumers and more📲 Are you down for a new experience? genuine content? curated resources? Join us to build a new way to explore the web #LensTags community is waiting for you in our #Discord: https://discord.com/invite/6wunUd6Ws4
I just voted "50/50 split" on "RFP-10: Expand POL Through Automated Pool Manager [Protocol Mechanics]" https://snapshot.org/#/radiantcapital.eth/proposal/0x43b694955e8197260a89d14e385fc746c2c3b7076ab44a2927af1c396fd03415 #snapshotlabs
This is Lenny
I just deposited $11.00 into my @pooltogether.lens prize savings account! Join me and thousands of others saving $46,147,119.64 and winning 125 prizes daily. #PoolTogether https://app.pooltogether.com?utm_campaign=in-app-share&utm_source=app&utm_medium=lenster&utm_content=deposit
I just voted "FOR - SharkDAO vote FOR" on "NounsDAO Prop 244 - Prop Lot: Where Ideas Find People" https://snapshot.org/#/sharkdao.eth/proposal/0x5f25203907d548eb8b1d1d81840612a5415826f476da5962e37c692df6b4b59b #snapshotlabs
How do you get a purple check on @lenster.lens ?
I just voted "FOR - SharkDAO vote FOR" on "NounsDAO Prop 242 - House of Nouns v2 (revised)" https://snapshot.org/#/sharkdao.eth/proposal/0x84457de4b16f6be2970aea0cd7475aface28a81e1934125d676d7f6182273d05 #snapshotlabs
I just voted "For" on "[HIP-21] Hop DAO Ambassador Program" https://snapshot.org/#/hop.eth/proposal/0x8dee191174613d6f0468e4df99598de919a5c1364ae7b14990f28beec3d5da0a #snapshotlabs
I just voted "Yes" on "Additional PancakeSwap Farm Proposal" https://snapshot.org/#/stgdao.eth/proposal/0xe9ee47fa9148b1ef9820dcb6504b423f99d0bc4243e917beee12018e234dbb48 #snapshotlabs