CryptoBang (@conba) • Hey
Cognitive monetizer. YT: https://youtube.com/@biggang
Publications
- I don’t want to spoil too much, but….
@lens/talentprotocol 🌿
- GM
- FUEL Airdrop
FUEL Airdrop
- IO.NET GPU DEPIN SOLANA
IO.NET GPU DEPIN SOLANA
- LayerZero Airdrop
LayerZero Airdrop
- We reached 10000+ followers on @lens/lens 🥳🥳🥳
Collecting is free for our followers, as a "thank you" 🤗
- HyperLane Airdrop
HyperLane Airdrop
- You know what is it?
- Waz up
- #Qin
- What is Lens Protocal
What is Lens Protocal
- GM!
- **There are 250k tickets left. You collect tickets with your shared reference code. It offers airdrop distribution based on the ticket points you collect.**
After connecting the wallet to the site, type *8Vm5T6B4R* in the *"verify your referral code"* section instead.
`airdrop.themis.exchange`
**My Reference Code:** 8Vm5T6B4R
- 🐶
- GMX on arbitrum
$GMX
- https://youtu.be/YJLZ5S7C3Gc
#FIL $FIL
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQl8PV79vUM&t=202s
#Lens 明牌空投机会，#AAVE 团队打造史上最强去中心化协议：Lens Protocal , 2023年是Web3 SocialFi爆发元年？
- 论体验，Lens比前阵子大火的Damus要好太多。
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkLJTkYAAVQ&t=610s
上周刚做完节目，GNS和GMX就暴涨。
- 0/ The tokenomic of $CULT is really blinding my eyes, CULTDAO Although the official website has diagrams explaining the economic model, it is not detailed enough, and some details are not shown.：
I am more interested in tokenomics, and I have also analyzed algorithmic stablecoins in previous tweet, so today I will take advantage of the holiday to draw pictures and write articles to review #CultDao's #tokenomics.
#Token is now widely circulated and used in the #blockchain world. The difference from previous years is that the design of today's token model is more diverse, and it has been The single function of the evolution to the present composite function.
Because a single function cannot survive unless a token with a super consensus like #Bitcoin can survive, it is generally impossible to rely on the curse of the dead king spiral.
After #OlympusDAO invented the prisoner's dilemma-based (3,3) game, and its simple staking method detonated the market for a while, but then also ushered in the collapse of the price, due to the value capture of $OHM or Token empowerment The scene is too single, that is stakin
The design of Cult.DAO's token economic model seems to make up for the above two shortcomings. It looks a bit like an #IDO platform, but it is a decentralized venture capital,and ultimately carries the #consensus and interests of the community through the organizational form of DAO distribution, so it is extremely unique. So I simply summarize: CULT.DAO = #IDO + #DEVC + #DAO The difference between CULT.DAO and IDO platform: First of all, it is somewhat like an IDO platform, but it is not an IDO platform in the traditional sense. CULT.DAO is different from traditional IDO mainly in the following two points:
1. The traditional IDO platform is not actually an IDO (Initial dex offerings) in the true sense. These platforms just accept a decentralized wallet and only realize the entrance decentralization, and does not realize the decentralization of business or workflow
In the previous IDO platform, the platform itself decided which projects to list, and if the project was listed on the IDO platform, a large amount of listing fees was required, and these fees were almost exclusively used by the IDO platform as profits.
The CULT is the selection and proposal of the project by the guardian, and then voted by the voters. 3. The IDO platform will eventually distribute the obtained tokens to users, while CULT is to sell the tokens and exchange them for CULT, and then destroy and distribute.
If the project of the project party wants to be listed on CULT.DAO, there are two ways: either buy a large amount of CULT for pledge, and enter the TOP50. Either bribe the Guardian through other means to make a proposal for the project.
Therefore, the IDO aspect of CULT is that the community decides the project, and there is no need to list the cost, and the guardian selects the project.
The difference between CULT.DAO and traditional VC: 1. Decentralization: Traditional VCs often need project analysis, backtracking, communication, post-investment management, etc., while CULT.DAO delegates this power to each Guardians,they act as VC brokers to find projects in the market. 2. The sources of investment funds are different: traditional VCs often raise funds from investors, self-operated funds, or family funds.
However, the funds of CULT come from the transaction fee of the CULT token itself. 3. Different profit sharing methods: Traditional VCs often use fund management fees to obtain profits, while CULT does not need to promise to share profits for investors.
In fact, there are no investors in CULT DAO at all, or everyone are investors. Because the investment profits obtained are used to repurchase CULT, and then half of them are destroyed, and half of them are returned to the stakers.
- 0/ The tokenomic of $CULT is really blinding my eyes, CULTDAO Although the official website has diagrams explaining the economic model, it is not detailed enough, and some details are not shown.：
I am more interested in tokenomics, and I have also analyzed algorithmic stablecoins in previous tweet, so today I will take advantage of the holiday to draw pictures and write articles to review #CultDao's #tokenomics.
#Token is now widely circulated and used in the #blockchain world. The difference from previous years is that the design of today's token model is more diverse, and it has been The single function of the evolution to the present composite function.
Because a single function cannot survive unless a token with a super consensus like #Bitcoin can survive, it is generally impossible to rely on the curse of the dead king spiral.
After #OlympusDAO invented the prisoner's dilemma-based (3,3) game, and its simple staking method detonated the market for a while, but then also ushered in the collapse of the price, due to the value capture of $OHM or Token empowerment The scene is too single, that is stakin
The design of Cult.DAO's token economic model seems to make up for the above two shortcomings. It looks a bit like an #IDO platform, but it is a decentralized venture capital,and ultimately carries the #consensus and interests of the community through the organizational form of DAO distribution, so it is extremely unique. So I simply summarize: CULT.DAO = #IDO + #DEVC + #DAO The difference between CULT.DAO and IDO platform: First of all, it is somewhat like an IDO platform, but it is not an IDO platform in the traditional sense. CULT.DAO is different from traditional IDO mainly in the following two points:
1. The traditional IDO platform is not actually an IDO (Initial dex offerings) in the true sense. These platforms just accept a decentralized wallet and only realize the entrance decentralization, and does not realize the decentralization of business or workflow
In the previous IDO platform, the platform itself decided which projects to list, and if the project was listed on the IDO platform, a large amount of listing fees was required, and these fees were almost exclusively used by the IDO platform as profits.
The CULT is the selection and proposal of the project by the guardian, and then voted by the voters. 3. The IDO platform will eventually distribute the obtained tokens to users, while CULT is to sell the tokens and exchange them for CULT, and then destroy and distribute.
If the project of the project party wants to be listed on CULT.DAO, there are two ways: either buy a large amount of CULT for pledge, and enter the TOP50. Either bribe the Guardian through other means to make a proposal for the project.
Therefore, the IDO aspect of CULT is that the community decides the project, and there is no need to list the cost, and the guardian selects the project.
The difference between CULT.DAO and traditional VC: 1. Decentralization: Traditional VCs often need project analysis, backtracking, communication, post-investment management, etc., while CULT.DAO delegates this power to each Guardians,they act as VC brokers to find projects in the market. 2. The sources of investment funds are different: traditional VCs often raise funds from investors, self-operated funds, or family funds.
However, the funds of CULT come from the transaction fee of the CULT token itself. 3. Different profit sharing methods: Traditional VCs often use fund management fees to obtain profits, while CULT does not need to promise to share profits for investors.
In fact, there are no investors in CULT DAO at all, or everyone are investors. Because the investment profits obtained are used to repurchase CULT, and then half of them are destroyed, and half of them are returned to the stakers.
- Hold fast to dreams,
For if dreams die
Life is a broken-winged bird,
That cannot fly