rmarquez28 (@54438) • Hey

software!!!!

Stats

Publications

gm **4/20** 👋
gm lens frens 👋 Today I have made an important decision in my life 📢 I quit my job today and going to focus full-time on maintaining the first-ever open-source frontend @lenster.lens 🌸 powered by @lensprotocol 🌿. Building social media was my dream since 10th grade, I built more than 4 social media in public but all failed, Lenster is my 5th one and it’s going crazy ⚡️. I believe building in public is key 🔑 to the success of a product. We have a lot of items queued up in the roadmap, be excited about it 🕺 **Collect this post for 2 WMATIC and support Lenster’s development 🙏**
efwagerger waefgwegw
Music is the most consumed art in people’s life, but the least in terms of revenues. More than a decade has passed since we had the last major shift in this industry. A new one might be just around the corner...
Music is the most consumed art in people’s life, but the least in terms of revenues. More than a decade has passed since we had the last major shift in this industry. A new one might be just around the corner...
I just signed the Glass Manifesto and got early access to claim The Glass Pass. See you on @glassxyz.lens : https://glass.xyz/manifesto
FIRST 3D TEST
Heeeey
Hey everyone! This post is my attempt at some Socratic philosophy. Please read it scenically and with an open mind. The goal of this dialect is to either disprove atheism, or prove that there are two planes of reality. As a gnostic, this is an important exercise in affirming or proving my personal beliefs of the hypostasis. If you think of a good criticism, I would really enjoy it! Here it goes: So we are going to start by making two assumptions that have to be true for reality to exist in only one plane of existence. The first assumption is: The universe must be infinite. If this is untrue then the universe must be contained within another set of reality. The second assumption is that: consciousness is created by a summation of atomic like particles. If this is untrue then consciousness is arising (or in my biased opinion connecting) to our perceived plane of reality. So the first natural question is this: Is consciousness made up of matter? We look at the laws defined and say, “yes, consciousness is made up of matter.” The next question is this, “Given infinite time, should our consciousness be reconstructed by the realignment of matter.” When we look at the laws defined we should answer, “Yes, given an infinite time after death our consciousness should be reconstructed, and it should in fact be ‘us.’” The next question is more perplexing: “Based on the statement that consciousness can be reconstructed given an infinite amount of time, would you say that in an infinite universe, you should be conscious in greater than one location?” While unintuitive, the answer according to our laws is: “yes, of course.” Now the follow up is the real killer, “Then why aren’t you? Why aren’t you or any of the other of billions of humans on earth experiencing.” The clear answer is that one of the two laws is incorrect, imo disproving the notion of atheism. The best counter arguments imo are the monist-everything is happening in your head, but I still think that’s two planes: your head and perceived reality. And, there’s also the argument that consciousness is serial, not continuous, and generated in parallel with the surrounding universe, so the laws would be true and you would just be interacting with parallel universes simultaneously, but I don’t really buy that personally. Anyway, I hope you all enjoyed and please lmk your thoughts!
Hey everyone! This post is my attempt at some Socratic philosophy. Please read it scenically and with an open mind. The goal of this dialect is to either disprove atheism, or prove that there are two planes of reality. As a gnostic, this is an important exercise in affirming or proving my personal beliefs of the hypostasis. If you think of a good criticism, I would really enjoy it! Here it goes: So we are going to start by making two assumptions that have to be true for reality to exist in only one plane of existence. The first assumption is: The universe must be infinite. If this is untrue then the universe must be contained within another set of reality. The second assumption is that: consciousness is created by a summation of atomic like particles. If this is untrue then consciousness is arising (or in my biased opinion connecting) to our perceived plane of reality. So the first natural question is this: Is consciousness made up of matter? We look at the laws defined and say, “yes, consciousness is made up of matter.” The next question is this, “Given infinite time, should our consciousness be reconstructed by the realignment of matter.” When we look at the laws defined we should answer, “Yes, given an infinite time after death our consciousness should be reconstructed, and it should in fact be ‘us.’” The next question is more perplexing: “Based on the statement that consciousness can be reconstructed given an infinite amount of time, would you say that in an infinite universe, you should be conscious in greater than one location?” While unintuitive, the answer according to our laws is: “yes, of course.” Now the follow up is the real killer, “Then why aren’t you? Why aren’t you or any of the other of billions of humans on earth experiencing.” The clear answer is that one of the two laws is incorrect, imo disproving the notion of atheism. The best counter arguments imo are the monist-everything is happening in your head, but I still think that’s two planes: your head and perceived reality. And, there’s also the argument that consciousness is serial, not continuous, and generated in parallel with the surrounding universe, so the laws would be true and you would just be interacting with parallel universes simultaneously, but I don’t really buy that personally. Anyway, I hope you all enjoyed and please lmk your thoughts!
A good day to be grateful for life
Wen win ?
Morning breakfast 😊😊
Made this art last night 😊😊
Gm🙏🏻 The morning breeze comes with peace 🕊️
What is a zkEVM? | The Edge Podcast This is a clip from our most recent episode of The Edge Podcast with Marco Cora, the Head of Business Development at Matter Labs (zkSync) about their flagship zkEVM. 📺 For the full episode, watch it here on Lenstube: https://lenstube.xyz/watch/0x2e09-0xe4 🎙️ If you prefer a podcast player, subscribe and listen to The Edge Podcast here: https://anchor.fm/edgepod THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION OR ENDORSEMENT TO BUY ANY TOKEN OR NFT RELATED TO ANY PLATFORMS DISCUSSED. ------ 🙏 The Edge Podcast is produced by 4RC Labs. If you're a DeFi/Web3 builder, contact our team at: https://fourthrevolution.capital/ 🙋‍♀️ Interested to sponsor episodes of The Edge? Fill this out: https://hl6pu9d99u5.typeform.com/to/E3NY5Mqn ------ 🌲 LINKTREE FOR THE EDGE PODCAST: https://linktr.ee/edge_pod 🔎 DISCOVER DEFI & WEB3 BLOG POSTS, PODCASTS, TUTORIALS: http://defidad.com/ ✅ FOLLOW DEFI DAD ON LENSTER: https://lenster.xyz/u/defidad ✅ FOLLOW NOMATIC ON TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Nomaticcap ------ The Edge Podcast Sponsor Resources 📈 GTRADE | DECENTRALIZED LEVERAGE TRADING ON POLYGON AND ARBITRUM https://gains.trade/ 🌊 STADER | MULTICHAIN LIQUID STAKING https://staderlabs.com/ 🔔 PUSH PROTOCOL | WEB3 COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL https://app.push.org/ 🌿 LENS | DECENTRALIZED SOCIAL GRAPH https://lens.xyz/ ⛩️ UTOPIA | PAYROLL AND EXPENSE MANAGEMENT FOR DAOS https://www.utopialabs.com/ ------ Guest Links Marco Cora on Twitter https://twitter.com/Be1garat zkSync on Twitter https://twitter.com/zksync Learn about zkSync Era https://zksync.io Learn about Matter Labs https://matter-labs.io/ ----- All opinions expressed by hosts and podcast guests are solely their own opinions and not necessarily those of Fourth Revolution Capital. Podcast guests and 4RC may have positions in the assets or other matters discussed in this podcast. 4RC invested in the Series B round for zkSync. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Do your own research.
Gm, woke up with my art 🔥