Comment by @crypto-z • Hey
I think you are perfectly crystalizing the disconnect between Lens and Builders.
To think that projects don't deserve funding if they don't solve "real pr
Comments
- To clarify a point however, I am on the camp believe migrating is urgent, we need AA and complete abstractated on boarding, we need FREE profile creation, and more.. We need to revive the faith and belief that yes users will actually be able to onboard this new world.
I believe we need new incentives at the chain level, to bring back builders, new models (Blast and Model) are changing the game, we need to unlock new business models for apps.
- @lens/crypto-z I am sorry if my comment was cause of frustration. It was far from my intention. I am here as a peer to learn as we go.
One thing I would like to clarify is that:
*"projects don't deserve funding if they don't solve "real problems" shows a deep misunderstanding of the role of Art, Culture, Music, Entertainment, gaming and those who dedicate their lives to make great work"*
is like reading something I didn't say.
Like I said in my other reply to @lens/paulburke I am making an observation based on my personal experience. A product that finds its audience is probably satisfying that audience needs.
Take for example \[LIP-23]\(<https://github.com/lens-protocol/LIPs/pull/51)> proposal. With the Executor App fee slice, the user has control over which app gets a reward by simply collecting a publication in one app over another (if the builder opt-in into this behaviour). Now if one app is what they chose to use, they are implicitly rewarding that app.
I feel these types of dynamics are interesting and worth exploring more.
Your choice of building on Lens is deeply appreciated and, as you know from support on Discord, I am personally happy to help anybody to build their ideas.