Comment by @larryscruff • Hey
The Optimism network doesn’t have any way to prove its transactions aren't fraudulent to the L1 state. Polygon POS is more secure than this. -_-
Stats
Actions: 0
Comments: 0
Likes: 45
Mirrors: 22
Quotes: 0
Comments
the way they currently solve it is by managing the sequencer fully yes
wut!! 🫨
Isn’t that the point of fraud proofs in stead of validity proofs? In my understanding this is the reason why there is a contestation period, that you have to wait to exit to L1. During this period, your exit can be contested with a fraud proof. A validity proof would allow for a ln instant exit to L1. This is what zk L2s do. It seems like you’re shouting wolf, for something that has been out in the open from the very get go.
the way they currently solve it is by managing the sequencer fully yes
wut!! 🫨
Isn’t that the point of fraud proofs in stead of validity proofs? In my understanding this is the reason why there is a contestation period, that you have to wait to exit to L1. During this period, your exit can be contested with a fraud proof. A validity proof would allow for a ln instant exit to L1. This is what zk L2s do. It seems like you’re shouting wolf, for something that has been out in the open from the very get go.