Comment by @punkess • Hey
🤔 not sure I get your point.
The utility might be related to lens - like idk imagine @cavernaeremita.lens creates a post with harberger tax that allows e
Comments
- Hey @punkess.lens . I think I got the basics of harberger tax. 🙂 These are interesting ideas that at first seem like just taxes, but the idea of something always being for sale (or, when buying, you would already have to define the sale price) seems to me too strange and in a way somewhat contradictory with the concept of ownership from the crypto world, but it's good for keeping capital flowing.... but if applied towards a cause or organization it looks interesting. I thought about @minttrees.lens , these applied concepts would be good for the cause, especially the maintenance fee for an NFT, because having it in your portfolio would not only support the project 1x, but always support it. But to me, just with the basics, it seems like a subscription you can't unsubscribe from 😛 But in terms of marketing, a "subscription" with a limited number, especially when it comes to important causes and their added symbolic value, looks very promising, especially when the purchase is guaranteed 🙂
Hope I expressed myself well 🙂
- In addition to the language barrier, you proposed something I had never heard of before, which is the 'harberger tax'... Which, in fact, in a quick reading and with very few references, I did not fully understand (I'm in a moment of non-study, final of the week...) I think a more elaborate answer will take longer than usual 🙂 And it will probably be left for another conversation. But... I just wanted to create a concise collection in the lens, that's all... I think the possibilities of smart contracts haven't even started to be explored, we're still in buying and selling and I see it in the most complex social interactions.