Post by @yoginth • Hey
gm frens 👋
What do you think? Should **Snapshot-powered Lenster polls** be anonymized or not 🔐
Please vote 🗳️ and feel free to share your thoughts in
Comments
- First, this is awesome I can’t believe I didn’t see it before.
Second, France 🇫🇷
Third, aren’t votings public? I mean, you can make them anonymous on Lenster but are public on the blockchain right?
- Like most of the people said, they should be anonymous by default, but I should be able to vote publicly if I want to. Also I should not be able to see the voting results before I vote. It can be misleading for some people.
- I prefer to have the optionality for both and letting the voter to decide to either keep anonymous or doxx for signalling
- Anonymous voting seems to be good default, but maybe someone could decide if he want the vote to be public
- This looks great @yoginth.lens! I would say it'd be nice to toggle between anonymized or not 🤔 @jessyjeanne.lens!!! check it out polls 🤩
- Anon with the option to see who voted, but not how they voted.
- This is super cool. A much needed feature on Lens
Bring em Polls !!
- Anon 💯
- Anon
- Having the choice is important ✅
- cool one!
- Wait for this feature. Awesome.
- It would be great if the voter vote according to their thoughts and opinions, and voting anonymously would be an option which avoid voter of effect of others, so, in This case i think snapshot would be a suitable Option.
- Voting should anonymous 🙂
- Voting should anonymous imo
- Voting should be anonymous
- Voting should anonymous...
- I believe that voting should always be anonymous. The criteria to be able to vote will already be public and will be onchain I guess
- its so good if we can vote in lens and no need snapshot for vote
- I believe that that voting should anonymous
- I prefer anon polls
- always more improvement and work I love it I think it would be cool to let the people who vote choose if they want to remain anonymous or not
- Anonymous vote
- Anonymous, just m'y thought
- Yes. Must be anonymous. That will be fair..
- In most cases, anonymous voting seems like the better approach, especially regarding personal votes. However, there are certain situations in which having publically visible votes seems necessary, e.g.:
1. When someone votes on behalf of others, everyone (or at the very least those he represents) should have the ability to see their votes.
2. People might want to show their votes to prove they stand behind what they say.
3. When there is a conflict of interest, influenced parties may want/need to show their votes.
In general, I think having the option and the ability to choose is the best for users, but the design should also consider the situations in which votes should be public.
- vote❤️
- vote 😊
- I'm choose anonnymous side👌
- I'd rather have both and let the voter decide whether or not to remain anonymous, and that's great.
- I hope so, but currently snapshot do not need gas to execute
- we are on blockchain so no, should be open to be seen👀
- I voted "YES"
- i vote yes
- anonymous voting
- wish to remain anonymous
- this voting is so important. tnxx
- not reveal one's name
- Yes, with the option to publicize it.
- My vote is not showing green though
- Anonymous
- I prefer both of them, anyone can participate as they like
- hiding votes make better filling for every one
- This is insane
- i think not
- very good idea
- off course they should.
- why i cant vote?
- looking forward!
- super cool ser