Comment by @grams • Hey

Appreciate the transparency but major problem: What if we don't wish to keep all funds in our creator wallet that is most susceptible? Now we're all FOMO'

Stats

Comments

well said fren. i hope the team understands this
I feel this about several projects. For instance Venom Network. They changed their twitter verification in December at tast 19 knowing that we would need 23 to qualify. They knew damn well that a lot of people lost their X accounts and they refused to allow people to update their twitter to a new account which pretty much weeded out a third or more of the people who would have qualified which those tokens ended up going to the ones who did. I cannot WAIT until the bankers get sick of this stuff and start filing suit against these blockchains that cheat their users. Not saying that about Bonsi but I completely understand. Im not a hardcore user here but I use Phaver and Orb more than any other platform including X and Facebook and I do not believe I was eligible for a single token. Im sure as hell not going to buy them to post. Ill just move on and use this only when needed. But Im sure not going to support a platform that cheated its users out of an airdrop by either not telling them what was needed or especially if they change the rules after the fact. The one thing I HATE about crypto is they do not have to disclose how to qualify to get paid when you do the work, and the fact that it is Mob rule when it comes to voting. It should be One Person One Vote not One coin per vote.