Comment by @igolle • Hey
Interesting question and proposition! I'm not sure the answer of one of the two laws being incorrect is as clear as you say.
The reason I'm not sure is b
Comments
- Adding on to this for the questions, Q1: 100% no. There’s literally no evidence that consciousness is made by the brain. There’s a lot of people who talk about consciousness when really they’re describing a function on top of consciousness like synesthesia or attention. Q2: Yes, it’s something else entirely. Because you can “direct it.” Don’t equate them, they’re not the same. To think therefore exists let’s you know you exist, but you don’t need to think to exist yk.
- “What kind of a fool includes his own death as a part of the plan” -Onepiece cool quote lmao. That’s definitely a possibility. I personally believe every reality and person is derived from a central point of unlimited energy, so in that sense it’s perfectly possible - if not likely that we all made from the same thing (this is what I personally call monad) the term God doesn’t really fit it for me. But, let’s buy that theory, if the only thing differentiating us is our brains - where the heck is our consciousness. It has to be greater than our brains, in a spiritual plain of reality or else you’re buying into the idea that I could take your consciousness in this plain of reality and transplant it into my body as mine to yours. Personally speaking, I don’t but it. And, I also think it’s pretty sus that we have a completely rigid physics engine because imo if we were the plain of first existence we should have unlimited freedom and power to design whatever physics engine we want. Long rant idk if this answered anything but lmk it’s a very good argument imo. But here’s my counter argument: given an infinite time for the two laws, you should be able to be reconstructed with your memories, but let’s say for example that we’re looking for 1 memory of something that happened, but didn’t happen to their body. This again with a n= 7 billion doesn’t happen. People can have false memories and it’s quite easy to prompt them, but no one has ever alleged to previously know something that’s true that they couldn’t have known just by guessing and can prove it via an fMRI (which has been show to be able to distinguish false created memories from ingrained memories with relatively solid evidence). Again definitely a possibility. 🫡 Ty ser.
- Going to be thinking about this for awhile tbh. First thought is that if we are all consciously the “same” that invalidates the idea that consciousness is made up by atom’s because of fragility, vibrations, etc. okay okay, let’s look at this, if all of the consciousness is the same right? What determines which consciousness you experience? Do you see what I mean here? If we are the spirit of monad, what is defining which perceptual experience we are interpreting. And this is the same exact argument for atoms or not. If you bake two isaacs what determines which Isaac experiences each perceptual experience on this plain. Now is where you come back and say, but you can’t make > 1 Isaac there is only one Isaac, and if that is the case, then Isaac has to be some unique token from another reality. Find a flaw in my logic. 🙏