Comment by @punkess • Hey

very interesting, thanks for sharing :-). I guess price should ideally be related to the value the content generates for the user / future owner. I’m not

Stats

Comments

is a pay what you want feature a good idea? I'm not sure and haven't thought much about it. just came to mind.
Encountered a few weird mirrors in my day where after inspecting the original post, I realized the OP was free to collect but the mirror instantiated a collect fee. 🤮
Thank you! 1. content value for futer owner over the work put into creating content - this is a very important distinction. You can put a lot of work into something that has no value to the content holder. 2. How collects help to reach more users? I need more to collect if @bonsai cooking this kind of drop! 😄 3. I'm always happy to read longer posts, to go deeper with some topics, I am overwhelmed by the culture of images and hot takes. 4. Mirrors - I would like to understand better how this mechanism works. Is it well described somewhere? I think this functionality has a lot of potential to make a big difference to creatives. It would be nice if mirror = collect - when I set up a 50% mirror, it means that I do collect for 50% and the other 50% is the mirror fee - the creator pays me to mirror his content.