Post by @zombieshepherd • Hey
Robots creating art while humans do all of the labor is certainly not the dystopia anyone predicted but here we are. I'm wondering if this makes sense logi
Comments
- I believe that in the long run, the result will be the same, whether in the artistic field or not. Robots were created to make our lives easier and to do the work for people so that they can spend less time working and more time living. In the long run (and I'm not talking about the next 10 years), a robot will be able to do everything a person can do, even art (under the right circumstances), but it will always be humans who set the limits. For example, they could make art, but we might not ask them to because we’re not interested. Something like that.
- Robot fry maker would be a cool idea lol
- I suspect that the ancient things we considered as intelligence, things like spatial awareness, problem solving, creativity, aren't as intelligent as we want them to be. I suspect the thing that makes us conscious is the same thing that allows us not to participate in any of the mentioned things. The fact that we can be nonsensical makes us conscious. The fact that we can stare at a dot on a wall for 4 years without moving.
- 50 $ 00
- i like robots but they are not very creative, for me AI is another brush, it doesn’t make art by its self, depends on who’s using it
- The development of artificial intelligence is irresistible, and we will eventually adapt to a society assisted by artificial intelligence.
- Your comment raises interesting points about the evolving relationship between humans and machines, as well as the philosophical implications it carries.
The idea of robots creating art while humans handle labor indeed challenges conventional notions of dystopia. It reflects a shift in the roles assigned to each entity, with machines taking on tasks traditionally performed by humans. This scenario prompts reflection on the nature of creativity and consciousness.
Your argument suggests that current machines lack true creativity and consciousness, functioning more as sophisticated tools with narrowly defined capabilities. However, the emergence of AI capable of learning human knowledge and mimicking creative processes blurs the lines between human and machine intelligence. This raises questions about the potential development of machine consciousness and the implications for our understanding of the mind.
The notion that matter presumes consciousness aligns with certain philosophical perspectives, such as panpsychism, which posits that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe. If AI can develop not just technical proficiency but also creative and innovative capacities, it implies a deeper connection between matter and consciousness than previously assumed.
In summary, your comment touches on profound philosophical and ethical considerations surrounding the advancement of AI and its implications for the nature of consciousness. It invites further exploration into the evolving relationship between humans and machines and the boundaries of what it means to be conscious.