Comment by @magicwand • Hey

Fair point. Some of my cents: Maybe I would just feel sorry for @lens/potential who spent thousands of dollars to support other's work while got eliminated

Stats

Comments

Thanks for the shout out. I'm a bit salty, but quite fine is general, can't complain. It seems that anybody who sold or moved bonsai at least once got eliminated. Maybe a better idea would have been something like this: Eliminate if balance at snapshot + spent on collects - received from collects < airdrops received. Optionally, define criteria which turns on this calculation model. E.g.: number of trades must be less than X, must have spent more than Y $bonsai on collects, etc. This would have allowed some trading as long as users bought more than they sold and were generally good actors.