Comment by @seliqui • Hey

"If the new network team isn't already on Lens and active" Well.... Can't really blame them for not being active on another Network if you're focused on b

Stats

Comments

Also, here really shows the issue with verified/squatted profiles, something I keep mentioning a while now. That there is nothing in place to dispute valid claims. I just checked the profiles (1:1 their official twitter handles as well as brand names) of the 8 networks I personally interact the most, and the result is pretty devastating. @lens/stani Handle owned by the Network: @lens/ethereum - not a single interaction on Lens so far Not yet minted (because 4 letter names): - Celo - Avax All in hands of squatters: - 0xpolygon - optimism - arbitrum - bnbchain - gnosischain As well as their official brand names who have been squatted: - polygon - avalanche - gnosis - binance (Explicitly not tagging any to not give them attention). I can totally understand, why none of these networks would be active on Lens at the moment 🤷
Not even Polygon. This is where Farcaster is winning. Somehow they are able to get all the OGs on their platform. Even @lens/vitalik is active on Farcaster.
I've seen multiple teams setting up their profiles across multiple platforms and networks