Comment by @ruthless • Hey
Adding a proof of humanity requirement might reduce the userbase, but it will increase the value of @wav3s.lens for promoters since they have the assurance
Stats
Actions: 0
Comments: 0
Likes: 14
Mirrors: 0
Quotes: 0
Comments
🤔 my thesis is that the profile mirroring the post is not really relevant (n=1) but the followers of the profile are (n>>1). If I would like to get visibility for a launching NFT project (like @ducks_everywhere.lens ) , I would love to have profiles mirroring the content who's **followers** are (a) interested in NFTs (b) active or at least interested in the ecosystem the project is launching in (in this case #StarkNet) and (c) have a history of minting/buying NFTs. If the profile with (a), (b) and (c) followers is human or a bot or something in between 🤷♀️. BUT if I get data about the interaction of the profile's followers with the profile's content (e.g. over the last 10 days), that's another data point I would be highly interested in. And most of the datapoints are publicly available, imo no need for PoH - for this use case.
I like that angle