Post by @grunia • Hey
Chains that wee need
So far all crypto world has a lot of different chains and L2 solutions, but did we need all of them? I personally use BNB, Polygon, E
Comments
- While I appreciate diversity and options, ETH probably didn’t need so many L2 chains. I use Polygon, BnB, Optimism, XLM, Base, BTC, on a fairly regular rolling basis.
I personally think Solana is not needed. It’s just not a significantly unique L1. It’s big and expensive. Full of fees.
Mass adoption is the goal. And the masses will never use ETH or Sol or any other token with those high fees.
- What do you think about Star Arena? Its hacked you know
- Diversity in blockchain development is essential for innovation and scalability. While your choice of BNB, Polygon, ETH, and Arbitrum serves your needs, it's important to remember that new chains can introduce novel features, address specific use cases, and enhance overall ecosystem resilience.
What may not be relevant to 90% of users today could become a game-changer for the entire crypto space tomorrow. New chains foster competition, which ultimately benefits users by driving advancements and pushing the boundaries of what's possible.
- Each chain serves a unique purpose and caters to different user needs. It's all about finding the right ones that work best for you.
- I think it is good for the user as the proliferation of chains creates competition.
- more chains mean more competition and more diversity