Post by @deidara • Hey
**Trading Volume shouldn't be the only criterion to evaluate an NFT project, especially PFP NFT.**\n\nIf everyone is so passionate about their PFP and want
Comments
- Never thought of this, great thought tho
- I agree, the trading volume is not suitable for many kind of NFTs. NFTs have a wide range of use cases so we need more metrics to judge if an NFT is good or not
- Great thought
- I agree, the trading volume is not suitable for many kind of NFTs. NFTs have a wide range of use cases so we need more metrics to judge if an NFT is good or not
- 👏👏
- Nice
- amazing
- those are some pretty good points
- DeFi x NFT will be will. @chainlink.lens dynamic NFT is a real innovation
- Trading volume is a nice metric, but like DeFi TVL, only one metric can not represents the effeciency,...
- "Premium community", laugh every time I see that 🙂
- It's funny when real people want to be in the community but the speculators have the money
- U got a point
- agree
- Looking forward to see other metrics to evaluate NFT
- NFT MM is a compulsory part if u want to success
- Yeah, in one discord you can only see a few active
- Waiting so long for another alpha ser, Wen?
- that is good
- Yuga Labs is leading, no doubt
- So much fake liquidity
- Hmmm...
- The communities are indeed great, but the speculator side is also important for an NFT project to success
- It seems that the community of top NFT collection isn't as strong as it seems
- I think the trading volume is still the core metrics to see the popularity of an NFT collection
- Definitely, projects can think more about this aspect when they start an NFT collection
- But trading volume represents liquidity